You are here

Economic damages caused by extreme natural disasters have increased significantly over the last 50 years.

Publication Date: 
08.10.2019

Floods, storms, hurricanes, heat waves, droughts, wildfires and landslides are among the natural disasters associated with climate change whose frequency and intensity has increased in the last decades.

In the last 50 years the economic impact of extreme events has grown by many folds, driven by substantial increases in the damage caused by each of these disasters; it can be estimated that in any given year a single catastrophic event costs about 4.8 million dollars more than in the previous year – controlling for changes in income and population.

This is, in a nutshell, what emerges from a recent study conducted by a group of researchers belonging to EMbeDS (the Department of Excellence for Economics and Management in the era of Data Science) and to the Institute of Economics of the Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies in Pisa in collaboration with researchers at the Pennsylvania State University.

The study, which was recently published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, analyzes data on a large number of disasters and shows that damages caused by extreme events have increased significantly over the last 50 years. This evidence is crucial for policy makers as they consider mitigation and adaptation measures to reduce the impact of natural disasters and contrast climate change.

The increase is especially strong in areas of the planet classified as temperate. Historically, these areas were less exposed to extreme events and sustained lower damages, but it is exactly in these areas that catastrofic damages are increasing faster.

"For instance, if we take as reference 1970 and 2010, the data shows that the 95th percentile of the damage distribution – corresponding to extreme events – grew about 10 fold. In practice, a single event among the most catastrophic (the top 5% of the damage distribution) caused over 300 million dollars in damages in 1970, and over 3.2 billion dollars in damages in 2010. – says Matteo Coronese, first author of the study and PhD student in Economics at the Sant’Anna School – To be sure, this increase is at least partially due to increases in wealth at risk (for instance, buildings) and population. But even when we account for these factors in our statistical models, we find a 3 fold increase in the economic impact of extreme events. In more detail, we estimate that in any given year a catastrophic event (in the top 5%) costs about 4.8 million dollars more than in the previous year – controlling for changes that can be attributed to the evolution of GDP and population.” 

The study is based on damage data for world-wide disasters occurred between 1960 and 2014, restricting attention to those potentially linked to climate change (Floods, storms, hurricanes, heat waves, droughts, wildfires and landslides). “The increase in damages we demonstrate is consistent with what one would expect due to climate change, even though our study does not examine whether this increase is directly attributable to climate change itself. – stresses Francesco Lamperti, author of the study and researcher in Economics at the Sant’Anna School – To establish a direct connection we need more studies, comprising additional and more sophisticated data”.  

Nevertheless, the study does control for a number of factors factors that can affect damage amounts, such as wealth and population in the area where a disaster occurs. “Our results are robust with respect to these factors and other technical aspects of the analysis, which uses statistical methods capable of capturing the evolution of catastrophic damages – not just average ones” explains Francesca Chiaromonte, author of the study, professor of Statistics at the Sant’Anna School and at Penn State University, and scientific coordinator of EMbeDS. “Through simulations we can also show that the patterns observed in the data are consistent with a theoretical model connecting changes in the mean values of climate-related variables (for instance wind speed in storms or hurricanes) with increases in the risk of extreme damages” explains Klaus Keller, professor of Geosciences and founding director of the Center for Climate Risk Management at Penn State University.

Care is paramount when drawing economic policy recommendations for politicians, firms, associations and other stakeholders. Nevertheless, “the study allows us to conclude that policy makers, along with all of us, must be prepared to face an increase in the economic impact of extreme natural disasters. – states Andrea Roventini, author of the study, professor of Economics at the Sant’Anna School, and Principal Investigator of the EU-funded GROWINPRO project – The need for actions that will help our societies mitigate catastrophic impacts and adapt to new climate conditions is ever more vital and imminent, even in temperate areas which were considered less exposed in the past. Moreover, in light of our results, caution would suggest the adoption of policies that, contrasting climate change, may contain frequency and intensity of natural disasters in the future.”